Lower the $2,500 appeal fee?
Incumbents: all three say no.
Challengers: all six say yes.
Compare the appeal-fee record →
HomeYour views · Their own words
Seventeen questions in five topic groups: elections and resident voice; downtown and historic homes; emergency readiness and healthcare; City spending and visitor costs; arts and environment. Measure E and term limits appear as one question. Choose Yes, No or Skip, then review documented positions, quotes, summaries and source links.
No login. Your entries stay in this page and are cleared when you reload.
Click on the questions belowWhere the record differs
Incumbents: all three say no.
Challengers: all six say yes.
Compare the appeal-fee record →Incumbents: all three oppose.
Challengers: all six support.
Compare the term-limit record →Compare plan updates, building heights and historic preservation separately. Support for an update does not automatically mean support for taller buildings or demolition.
Candidate positions and forum evidence →Incumbents: all three voted to uphold the June 11 approval on appeal.
Challengers: positions vary; compare individual proposals and concerns.
Individual answers and official votes →Appeal-fee and term-limit positions: Village Laguna forum, August 31, 2026. These are documented differences, with sources; candidate groups may disagree internally on other issues.
Question 1 of 17 · Elections & resident voice
Do you support Measure E, requiring term limits for City Council members?
Measure E addresses Council term limits. The Village Laguna forum asked about term limits; the candidate labels below use those answers, with explicit Measure E statements included where available.
Based on: Village Laguna forum · August 31, 2026; Advocates written questionnaire · question 1